The Why Behind the How: The Research Behind Participant-Centered Training, part three
By Kathleen O'Neill
As a company, The Bob Pike Group
uses brain-based research to create our training principles and promote our
participant-centered methods with research. Here is part three of a four-part
series that gives you the why behind our instructor-led, participant-centered
how.
By
Kathleen O'Neill
One
of Bob Pike's foundations for participant-centered training is the use of
closers, openers, energizers and revisiters (CORE) for having people interact
to increase retention and the fact learning should be fun and provide
participants with opportunities to practice new skills, apply new information
and increase their self-confidence and empowerment. In other words, the
trainees should leave feeling impressed with themselves, not the instructor.
Challenging
and stimulating experiences increase and strengthen neural networks and
therefore allow for greater connections and ultimately, greater retention. To
remember well, Tony Buzan [Use Both Sides
of Your Brain] said you need to include the "senses, movement, association,
humor, sexuality, imagination, exaggeration, symbolism, color, order, sequence,
positivity and numbers." This research support TBPG's use of various training
techniques that use movement, humor, imagination, color, and exaggeration.
B.
Duman [in his presentation The Effect of
Brain-Based Instruction Too Improve on Students' Academic Achievement in Social
Studies Instruction at the Ninth International Conference on Engineering
Education] explains that brain-based research has concluded that there are six
methods to strengthen recall of memory:
- notice
the importance of emotions,
- create
effective association,
- relate
learning to student's personal life,
- use
creative repetitions,
- remember
the importance of first and last and
- teach
special retention techniques.
Brain
based research also discusses training and cognition, or how the brain
processes new information. As Maureen Murphy writes in her University of North
Texas dissertation [Improving Learner
Reaction, Learning Score and Knowledge Retention through the Chunking Process
in Corporate Training], the brain based approach to cognitive processing
indicates that the brain does not receive the training sequentially and
chronically. The brain instead takes information and "parses it into categories
appending it into existing knowledge or forming new categories." The "parsing"
is unique to each learner but every learner parses and puts new information
into categories. This notion of "parsing" supports TBPG's effective training
ideas such as "revisiting, using action plans and graphic organizers, such as 'window
panes.'"
Furthermore,
brain based research indicates that learning transfer occurs when the learner applies
learning in novel situations and is the result of genuine understanding, not
mere rote behavior. When the learner is able to manipulate the new information
or retrieve it in their own personalized way, learning will occur.
Duman
concurs and states that teaching strategies that enhance brain based learning
include using manipulatives, active learning, field trips, guest speakers, and
creating real life projects that are attuned to using many learning styles and
multiple intelligences.
To read parts one and two of this article, click:
part one
part two