The Why behind the How: the Research on Participant-Centered Training
By Kathleen O'Neill
Some of Bob Pike's foundations
for participant-centered training are his 90/20/8 rule for how often people
need to be involved with content, participation and revisiting the information during
a workshop; the use of closers, openers, energizers and revisiters (CORE) for
having people interact to increase retention; and the fact learning should be
fun and provide participants with opportunities to practice new skills, apply
new information and increase their self-confidence and empowerment. In other
words, the trainees should leave feeling impressed with themselves, not the
instructor.
Research and theories on adult
learning related to brain-based learning, multiple intelligences and emotional
intelligences corroborate this.
As B. Duman cites in his 2006 presentation
for the Ninth International Conference on Engineering Education, neuroscience
has recently disclosed important information about the brain and how it learns.
The years between 1990 and 2000 were named the "the decade of the brain" as
this was the first time that scientists could study how the brain processes
while it is working. (In the past studies were done either on a dead person or
during an operation.) But advanced technological systems like the MRI and PET
have encouraged scientists to draw maps of the brain in lots of areas. As a
result, brain-based research has evolved and brain based learning is an
"instruction which takes into consideration how the brain takes, processes,
interprets information; makes connections; stores and remembers messages. It is
learner centered in its delivery and attempts to use the whole brain and also
recognizes that not all students learner the same way." Brain based learning is
also interested in how feelings affect learning and how these affect
perception, attention and memory, Duman said.
As Renate and Geoffrey Caine
indicate in their book Making Connection,
brain based learning focuses on how the brain learns and therefore accepts the
rules of brain processing and organizes training/teaching activities according
to these rules for meaningful learning. The aim of brain based learning is to
pass from memorizing to meaningful learning.
Traditional schooling often inhibits learning by
discouraging, ignoring, or punishing the brain's natural learning processes. Brain
based learning theory is really a meta-concept that includes an eclectic
mix of training/teaching techniques. This form of learning encompasses newer
educational concepts like learning styles, multiple intelligences, emotional
intelligence, and experiential education. These techniques allow instructors to
connect learning to participant's real lives and emotional experiences, as
well as to their personal histories and experiences.
Caine and Caine developed 12
principles that apply to what we know about the function of the brain and its
relationship to teaching and learning. They are as follows:
- The
brain is a parallel processor, meaning it can perform several activities at
once, like tasting and smelling.
- Learning
engages the whole physiology.
- The
search for meaning is innate.
- The
search for meaning comes through patterning.
- Emotions
are critical to patterning.
- The
brain processes wholes and parts simultaneously.
- Learning
involves both focused attention and peripheral perception.
- Learning
involves both conscious and unconscious processes.
- We
have two types of memory: spatial and rote.
- We understand best when facts
are embedded in natural, spatial memory.
- Learning is enhanced by
challenge and inhibited by threat.
- Each brain is unique.
For complex learning, Caine and Caine assert the following
three conditions need to exist:
Orchestrated immersion. Create
a learning
environment that fully immerses students in an educational experience and use
complex interactive experiences that are both real and rich. The brain can
parallel process.
Relaxed alertness. Try to eliminate fear in
learners while maintaining a highly challenging environment. In other words, create
a personally meaningful challenge.
Active processing. Allow the learner to consolidate
and internalize information by actively processing it-have an intensive
analysis of different ways to approach it.
Caine adds a few more specific training/teaching
implications regarding brain-based learning theory:
- Feedback
is best when it comes from reality, rather than from an authority figure.
- Every
brain is different, and so educators should allow learners to customize their
own learning.
- The
best problem solvers are those that laugh!
- Instructors
need to realize that the best way to learn is not through lecture, but by
participation in realistic environments that let learners try new things
safely.
- Students' emotional states also affect their
learning and creating a culture and environment where students feel safe will
also mean more learning.
Duman's theory that "enriched and
challenging environments produce more neural connections, while sterile and
boring ones can cause connections to wither and die" along with the Caine's
well-researched 12 principles provide some of the foundation for why we at The
Bob Pike Group feel our training methodology is relevant, based in fact, and
effective.
References
Caine, R., & Caine, G.
(1994). Making Connections: Teaching and the Human Brain. Menlo Park,
CA: Addison-Wesley. (An updated version of this text was published in 2005.
Renate has her Ph.D. in educational psychology and consults worldwide on this
topic.)
Duman, B. (2006) The effect of
brain-based instruction is to improve on students' academic achievement in
social studies instruction. 9Th
International conference on Engineering Education. pg. 17-25.
Pike, Robert, Creative Training Techniques Handbook.
Amherst, MA: HRD Press. 1987.
Pike, B., Pluth, B. The Bob Pike Group Train the Trainer Boot
Camp Guide, Eden Prairie, MN, The Bob Pike Group, ver. 2009.3